In People v. Loeffler, 175 Ill. 585, the court held that there was a clear repugnancy between certain provisions of the Cities and Villages Act and the later City Civil Service Act, and that because of such repugnancy there was a repeal by implication of certain provisions of the earlier act.
Summary of this case from People ex Rel. v. LipskyOctober 18, 1948.
Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion.
In People v. Loeffler, 175 Ill. 585, the court held that there was a clear repugnancy between certain provisions of the Cities and Villages Act and the later City Civil Service Act, and that because of such repugnancy there was a repeal by implication of certain provisions of the earlier act.
Summary of this case from People ex Rel. v. LipskyFull title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN LOEFFLER, JR.…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Oct 18, 1948
State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 119 Mo. 383, 394; State ex rel. Denison v. St. Louis, 90 Mo. 19, 22. (6) Relator…
People ex Rel. v. LipskyHe maintains that no matter how the subordinate positions under the election commissioners were filled under…