From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lesson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 21, 2006
32 A.D.3d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

16533.

September 21, 2006.

Kane, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Essex County (Halloran, J.), rendered September 6, 2005, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of incarceration.

Carolyn B. George, Albany, for appellant.

Julie A. Garcia, District Attorney, Elizabethtown, for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ.


Following his June 2001 conviction for attempted burglary in the third degree, defendant was sentenced to five years of probation. He thereafter admitted to violating a condition of his probation and, as a result, had the probation revoked and was resentenced to one year in jail. Defendant now appeals.

Inasmuch as defendant was released from jail in April 2006, his challenge to the finding of a probation violation has been rendered moot ( see People v Contrano, 274 AD2d 760, 760-761; People v Hamilton, 214 AD2d 783, 783), as has his claim that his resentence was harsh and excessive ( see People v Edmunds, 21 AD3d 578, 581, lv denied 5 NY3d 828; People v Young, 13 AD3d 716, 718). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot.


Summaries of

People v. Lesson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 21, 2006
32 A.D.3d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Lesson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT F. LESSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 21, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6514
820 N.Y.S.2d 821

Citing Cases

People v. Wiggins

Preliminarily, the People contend that defendant's appeal is rendered moot by the expiration of the maximum…

People v. Wiggins

Preliminarily, the People contend that defendant's appeal is rendered moot by the expiration of the maximum…