From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 6, 1995
214 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 6, 1995

Appeal from the County Court of Tompkins County (Sherman, J.).


On May 1, 1992, defendant was convicted of insurance fraud in the fourth degree and sentenced to a five-year term of probation. Following a hearing, defendant was found to have violated the restitution condition of his probation and was resentenced to an eight-month term of imprisonment. Defendant appeals. Inasmuch as defendant has completed the sentence imposed, his appeal has been rendered moot. Dismissal is appropriate because "defendant's appeal does not present a recurring issue of public interest which would otherwise escape appellate review" (People v Anderson, 197 A.D.2d 749, 750, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 921). In any event, were we not to dismiss the appeal as moot, we would affirm because we find that his contentions lack merit.

Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot.


Summaries of

People v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 6, 1995
214 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES HAMILTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 982

Citing Cases

State v. Sokolowski

Defendant's sole argument is that her sentence is harsh and excessive and that she should have been sentenced…

People v. Wiggins

Preliminarily, the People contend that defendant's appeal is rendered moot by the expiration of the maximum…