From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kennedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1922
202 App. Div. 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Summary

In Kennedy, the Court stated that "[s]uch other evidence may consist of corroborating circumstances, but the corroboration must be of a `strong character and not merely corroborative in slight particulars, and it must contradict in positive terms the statement of the accused.' 21 R.C.L. p. 272."

Summary of this case from People v. Lewandowski

Opinion

May, 1922.


Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Nassau county affirmed. No opinion. Blackmar, P.J., Kelly, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kennedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1922
202 App. Div. 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

In Kennedy, the Court stated that "[s]uch other evidence may consist of corroborating circumstances, but the corroboration must be of a `strong character and not merely corroborative in slight particulars, and it must contradict in positive terms the statement of the accused.' 21 R.C.L. p. 272."

Summary of this case from People v. Lewandowski
Case details for

People v. Kennedy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWIN KENNEDY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1922

Citations

202 App. Div. 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Citing Cases

The People v. Mikota

[3,4] Defendant also makes much of the fact that although the complaint was made by Chester Lairson, it was…

People v. Robinson

This is done by establishing the truth of its contradiction. It is not enough simply to contradict it, but…