Summary
In People v Jamison, 488 Mich 851; 788 NW2d 6 (2010), for example, the judgment of sentence incorrectly indicated the defendant was subject to sentence enhancement as an habitual offender.
Summary of this case from People v. CurryOpinion
No. 140905.
September 9, 2010.
Court of Appeals No. 295965.
Summary Disposition:
Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Chippewa Circuit Court for the ministerial correction of the judgment of sentence to reflect, in accordance with the plea agreement, the dismissal of the habitual offender, second offense, supplement under MCL 769.10. The original judgment of sentence and its two amended versions inaccurately indicate that the defendant was subject to sentence enhancement under MCL 769.10. We further order the trial court to ensure that the corrected judgment of sentence is transmitted to the Department of Corrections. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction.