From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 18, 1965
23 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Summary

In People v. Green (23 A.D.2d 500) it was stated that under the decisional law now applicable in this State the interrogation of an accused after his arrest, prior to his arraignment without advising him of his right to remain silent and of his right to an attorney, does not render inadmissible the statement obtained from the accused.

Summary of this case from People v. Jackson

Opinion

January 18, 1965


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 31, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of two counts of burglary in the third degree and of petit larceny, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Judgment affirmed. In our opinion, under the decisional law now applicable in this State, the interrogation of an accused after his arrest but prior to his arraignment, without advising him of his right to remain silent and of his right to an attorney, does not render inadmissible the statement obtained from the accused (cf. People v. Stanley, 15 N.Y.2d 30). Beldock, P.J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 18, 1965
23 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

In People v. Green (23 A.D.2d 500) it was stated that under the decisional law now applicable in this State the interrogation of an accused after his arrest, prior to his arraignment without advising him of his right to remain silent and of his right to an attorney, does not render inadmissible the statement obtained from the accused.

Summary of this case from People v. Jackson
Case details for

People v. Green

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LUTHER GREEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 18, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

People v. Ortiz

However, it is the law of this State that where no request was made for the aid of counsel or no inquiry was…

People v. McNeil

The court is not convinced that the Miranda and Johnson cases overruled or modified the decision written by…