From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clemmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1969
32 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

July 7, 1969


Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered December 13, 1968, convicting defendant of robbery in the third degree and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The findings of fact below are affirmed. In our opinion, the legality of appellant's arrest and detention on the loitering charge was, at the very least, a circumstance to be considered in determining the voluntariness of his confession ( People v. Carbonaro, 21 N.Y.2d 271, 277-278; People v. Everett, 10 N.Y.2d 500, 507; People v. Lane, 10 N.Y.2d 347, 352; People v. Blando, 23 A.D.2d 761; People v. Insetta, 19 A.D.2d 702; cf. Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721; People v. Herbison, 22 N.Y.2d 946, 947; People v. Morales, 22 N.Y.2d 55, cert. granted 394 U.S. 972; People v. Dannic, 30 A.D.2d 679, 680). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Hopkins, Munder and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Clemmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1969
32 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

People v. Clemmons

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CORNELIUS CLEMMONS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
303 N.Y.S.2d 209

Citing Cases

People v. Zakrzewski

It is a circumstance, however, to be considered in determining its voluntariness. ( People v. Spano, 4 N.Y.2d…

People v. Valerius

However, assuming appellant's questioning at the police station constituted custodial interrogation, prior to…