From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Herbison

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1968
242 N.E.2d 394 (N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

Argued October 7, 1968

Decided October 16, 1968

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, LINCOLN G. SCHMIDT, J.

Leon Kesner and James D. Saver for appellant.

George J. Aspland, District Attorney ( Thomas J. Klei of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and information dismissed. There was no probable cause for the arrest of defendant. His confession immediately followed this unlawful arrest, and must be considered inadmissible under the facts of this case. Had the confession been admissible, defendant's culpability could have been deemed established by entry into the premises by his accomplices (former Penal Law, § 2, defining "principal"; People v. Katz, 209 N.Y. 311, 325-326; People v. Henry, 18 A.D.2d 293). The People admit the insufficiency of their case.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.


Summaries of

People v. Herbison

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1968
242 N.E.2d 394 (N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

People v. Herbison

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE W. HERBISON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 16, 1968

Citations

242 N.E.2d 394 (N.Y. 1968)
242 N.E.2d 394
295 N.Y.S.2d 162

Citing Cases

People v. Young

The judgment of conviction must be reversed. There was no probable cause for the arrest and it cannot be…

People v. Valerio

It is unnecessary for the indictment to specifically charge defendant with aiding and abetting in the…