From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chandler

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2011
31 Misc. 3d 144 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In People v. Chandler, 31 Misc.3d 144 [2009], the court specifically held that a court's failure to pronounce the supplemental sex offender victim fee prior to the entry of the plea did not deprive defendant of the opportunity to knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently choose among alternative courses of action, citing Hoti, (Supra at 743).

Summary of this case from Reinard v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

May 20, 2011.

Appeal — Preservation of Issue for Review — Failure to Preserve Issues Regarding Legality of Supplemental Sex Offender Victim Fee. Criminal Procedure Law — § 470.05 (2) (Determination of appeals; preservation of issue for review).

Summaries of

People v. Chandler

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2011
31 Misc. 3d 144 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)

In People v. Chandler, 31 Misc.3d 144 [2009], the court specifically held that a court's failure to pronounce the supplemental sex offender victim fee prior to the entry of the plea did not deprive defendant of the opportunity to knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently choose among alternative courses of action, citing Hoti, (Supra at 743).

Summary of this case from Reinard v. State
Case details for

People v. Chandler

Case Details

Full title:People v. Chandler (Mark)

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 2011

Citations

31 Misc. 3d 144 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50931

Citing Cases

People v. Paris

On appeal, defendant argues that the fine, surcharges and fees were never mentioned or made a part of the…

Reinard v. State

In People v. Hoti, 12 N.Y.3d 742 [2009], the Court of Appeals held that the imposition of fees are not…

2 Citing Cases