From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cazeau

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 19, 2013
107 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-19

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Roy CAZEAU, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed February 25, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. Foster, 105 A.D.3d 1059, 963 N.Y.S.2d 594;People v. Bradshaw, 105 A.D.3d 758, 961 N.Y.S.2d 797).

ENG, P.J., SKELOS, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cazeau

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 19, 2013
107 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Cazeau

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Roy CAZEAU, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 19, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4618
966 N.Y.S.2d 868