From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bradshaw

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 3, 2013
105 A.D.3d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-3

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Olante BRADSHAW, appellant.

Thomas T. Keating, Dobbs Ferry, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff and Steven Bender of counsel), for respondent.


Thomas T. Keating, Dobbs Ferry, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff and Steven Bender of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colangelo, J.), rendered December 20, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the sentencing court failed to conduct a proper inquiry into his post-plea arrest before imposing an enhanced sentence is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Miles, 268 A.D.2d 489, 703 N.Y.S.2d 491). In any event, the sentencing court's inquiry was proper ( see generally People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702, 713, 594 N.Y.S.2d 683, 610 N.E.2d 356).

To the extent that the defendant contends that his sentence was excessive, that contention is precluded by the defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal ( see generally People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255–256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145).

DILLON, J.P., HALL, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bradshaw

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 3, 2013
105 A.D.3d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Bradshaw

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Olante BRADSHAW, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2262
961 N.Y.S.2d 797

Citing Cases

People v. Mancuso

Thus, the District Court was entitled to impose an enhanced sentence (see People v Jenkins, 11 NY3d 282, 288…

People v. Cazeau

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review…