From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Campbell

Supreme Court, Criminal Term, Kings County
Feb 18, 1966
48 Misc. 2d 798 (N.Y. Misc. 1966)

Summary

In People v. Campbell (48 Misc.2d 798) the indictment for abduction was dismissed because the abductee had voluntarily accompanied the defendant without the State for the purpose of marriage and was only two months shy of being 18 at the time.

Summary of this case from People v. Burke

Opinion

February 18, 1966

Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney ( John Meglio of counsel), for plaintiff.

Aaron R. Schacher for defendant.


On February 3, 1966 I granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment charging him with the crime of abduction (N.Y.L.J., Feb. 8, 1966, p. 18, col. 1). I reach the same conclusion but on other grounds. That decision is recalled and this one is substituted.

In the Grand Jury the complainant testified that she knew the defendant for six months; on November 29, 1965, they decided to get married; later that day they drove to Hagerstown, Maryland; they were married on December 2, 1965 at the Arden Methodist Church by a clergyman to whom she had given her age as 18; she did not have her parents' permission to go to Maryland for the purpose of marrying the defendant. The complainant's father testified that she was born on February 3, 1948; neither he nor his wife gave the complainant permission to go to Maryland to marry the defendant.

At the time the complainant went to Maryland with the defendant her 18th birthday was only two months away.

Section 671 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides: "The court may, either of its own motion, or upon the application of the district attorney, and in furtherance of justice, order an action, after indictment, to be dismissed."

Under the circumstances, the indictment is dismissed in furtherance of justice (§ 671).


Summaries of

People v. Campbell

Supreme Court, Criminal Term, Kings County
Feb 18, 1966
48 Misc. 2d 798 (N.Y. Misc. 1966)

In People v. Campbell (48 Misc.2d 798) the indictment for abduction was dismissed because the abductee had voluntarily accompanied the defendant without the State for the purpose of marriage and was only two months shy of being 18 at the time.

Summary of this case from People v. Burke
Case details for

People v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD CAMPBELL…

Court:Supreme Court, Criminal Term, Kings County

Date published: Feb 18, 1966

Citations

48 Misc. 2d 798 (N.Y. Misc. 1966)
267 N.Y.S.2d 5

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Appellate Div. of the Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.

(Id. at p. 132, citing People v. Davis (Super.Ct. 1967) 286 N.Y.S.2d 396, 397 [college student charged with a…

People v. Shanis

Thus, it is now well recognized that under section 671 it is within the court's sole discretion to dismiss an…