From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bugayong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1992
182 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Summary

In Bugayong the Appellate Division held that certain medical records of the complainant (apparently in the possession of the prosecution) should have been provided to the defendant after the trial court's in camera review thereof.

Summary of this case from People v. Jovanovic

Opinion

April 9, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.).


Defendant, in a nine count indictment, was charged with sexual attacks against two patients at Lincoln Hospital where he was employed as a nurse at the time, and, following a jury trial, he was found guilty of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and one count of sexual abuse in the third degree. All of the convictions, other than the one for sexual abuse in the third degree, arose out of the alleged assault against complainant M.C. In that regard, we have considered defendant's contentions on appeal and perceive no reversible error except in one respect.

Prior to trial, defense counsel requested permission to examine M.C.'s medical records in order to ascertain her physical condition when the subject incident occurred and the medication she was taking at the time. Before she took the stand, the District Attorney furnished several pages of her records and informed defendant's attorney that the testimony which he intended to elicit related only to her weakened state and not to the nature of her medical treatment. Further, the trial court examined the medical records in camera and supplied some additional information but determined that there was nothing else that should be turned over to the defense. This ruling, however, was incorrect. We have reviewed M.C.'s hospital records and believe that they should have been made available to defendant regardless of whether or not the Trial Judge would ultimately have allowed their contents to be used for cross-examination. At least defendant's lawyer would have had the opportunity to raise this matter with the court, particularly since there is material in the records which could arguably have provided some assistance to the defense. It is also possible that based upon these records, defendant might have endeavored to call his own expert witness. Accordingly, defendant is entitled to a new trial in connection with those counts dealing with the alleged attack upon M.C.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bugayong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1992
182 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

In Bugayong the Appellate Division held that certain medical records of the complainant (apparently in the possession of the prosecution) should have been provided to the defendant after the trial court's in camera review thereof.

Summary of this case from People v. Jovanovic
Case details for

People v. Bugayong

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GIL BUGAYONG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 175

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

or of the crimes alleged to have been committed on May 31, and June 1, 1988, and an independent source…

People v. Reynolds

In People v Wilson (17 Misc 2d 349 [Monroe County Ct 1959]), the court granted the defendant's motion to…