From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Buford

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 3, 1971
272 N.E.2d 738 (Ill. App. Ct. 1971)

Summary

In People v. Buford (1st Dist. 1971), 133 Ill. App.2d 287, 272 N.E.2d 738, the defendant first opened the door to new matter on redirect examination, and questions permitted on re-cross-examination which were within the scope of the redirect examination, were ruled to be proper.

Summary of this case from Grundy County National Bank v. Myre

Opinion

No. 53666 Judgment affirmed as modified.

May 10, 1971. Modified on denial of rehearing June 3, 1971. Abstract of Decision

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. FRANCIS T. DELANEY, Judge, presiding.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Mary Cahill, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel,) for appellant.

Edward V. Hanrahan, State's Attorney, of Chicago, (Robert A. Novelle, Assistant State's Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.


Abstract of Decision


Summaries of

People v. Buford

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 3, 1971
272 N.E.2d 738 (Ill. App. Ct. 1971)

In People v. Buford (1st Dist. 1971), 133 Ill. App.2d 287, 272 N.E.2d 738, the defendant first opened the door to new matter on redirect examination, and questions permitted on re-cross-examination which were within the scope of the redirect examination, were ruled to be proper.

Summary of this case from Grundy County National Bank v. Myre

In Buford the defendant was 22 years of age and while convicted of a heinous crime, he had never before been convicted of any crime and was never previously arrested.

Summary of this case from People v. Barger
Case details for

People v. Buford

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIE BUFORD…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 3, 1971

Citations

272 N.E.2d 738 (Ill. App. Ct. 1971)
133 Ill. App. 2d 287

Citing Cases

People v. Browry

In this case, after reviewing the evidence which shows the circumstances under which the offenses were…

People v. Barger

The defendant argues that the trial judge made the sentences long and consecutive for the express purpose of…