From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brunel Maxineau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 2010
78 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-09958.

November 3, 2010.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Knopf, J.), rendered October 5, 2009, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Jeanette Lifschitz of counsel; Steven Harkins on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Dillon, Balkin, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that the duration of the order of protection issued at the time of sentencing exceeded the maximum time limits of CPL 530.13 (4) and failed to take into account jail-time credits. However, the defendant failed to preserve this argument for appellate review because he did not raise the issue at sentencing or move to amend the final order of protection on this ground ( see CPL 470.05; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316-318), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see People v Dale, 43 AD3d 1075; People v Varner, 39 AD3d 882).


Summaries of

People v. Brunel Maxineau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 2010
78 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Brunel Maxineau

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRUNEL MAXINEAU…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 3, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7963
909 N.Y.S.2d 659

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

In any event, the defendant's contentions about the duration of the orders of protection issued at the time…

People v. Rodriguez

However, the defendant's challenge to the duration of the orders of protection issued at the time of…