From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 18, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 2005-07370, 2005-07371.

September 18, 2007.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), both rendered June 29, 2005, convicting him of assault in the first degree under indictment No. 2004-244, and attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree under indictment No. 2004-238, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Karen F. McGee of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

Before: Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Skelos, Carni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant argues that the duration of four orders of protection issued at the time of his sentencing exceeded the maximum limits of CPL 530.13 (4). However, the defendant failed to preserve this argument for appellate review because he did not raise the issue at sentencing or move to amend the final orders of protection on this ground ( see CPL 470.05; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316-318), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see People v Varner, 39 AD3d 882; cf. People v Johnson, 16 AD3d 521).


Summaries of

People v. Dale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 18, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Dale

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN DALE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 18, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6896
841 N.Y.S.2d 461

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.The defendant's challenge to the five-year duration of the final order…

People v. Smith

The defendant's challenge to the five-year duration of the final order of protection issued at sentencing in…