Summary
In Adams, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to apply for permission to appeal the Appellate Division's denial of his coram nobis motion on the ground that "no application for leave to appeal... will lie from the order of the Appellate Division denying an application for a writ of error coram nobis."
Summary of this case from Hizbullahankhamon v. WalkerOpinion
Submitted September 7, 1993
Decided October 7, 1993
Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 dismissed upon the ground that no application for leave to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 will lie from the order of the Appellate Division denying an application for a writ of error coram nobis (CPL 450.90).