holding that the arrest of a Navajo Indian on the reservation for extradition pursuant to Arizona law to another state "would clearly interfere with rights essential to the Navajo's self-government"
Summary of this case from State v. HicksNo. 652.
January 12, 1970.
Thomas A. Harrell for petitioner.
Scott Baldwin for respondents.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 414 F. 2d 1217.
holding that the arrest of a Navajo Indian on the reservation for extradition pursuant to Arizona law to another state "would clearly interfere with rights essential to the Navajo's self-government"
Summary of this case from State v. HicksFull title:PENROD DRILLING CO. v. JOHNSON ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 12, 1970
See also Shapiro v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc., 2 Cir. 1974, 495 F.2d 228; Walling v. Beverly…
State Securities, Inc. v. AndersonIn an attempt to determine whether Indian immunity from process is necessary in this case to protect the…