finding that a party has no right to a jury trial on its copyright infringement claim pursuant to Rule 55(b) or the Seventh Amendment

rejecting contention that a discharge which violated more than one permit parameter should be counted as a single violation, and holding that violation calculations should be undertaken "on a parameter by parameter basis"; with regard to the different types of limitations, holding that each type of limit is "clearly separate" and there is "no reason why [a defendant] should not be penalized separately for violating each limitation"

imposing sanctions for failure to comply with FED. R. APP. P. 32

discussing the Clean Water Act the court stated that the "likelihood may be established by showing that a defendant has 1

observing "if a plaintiff has alleged . . . that the waterway is unable to support aquatic life for example, but failed to show that defendant's effluent contains pollutants that harm aquatic life, then plaintiffs would lack standing"

discussing definition of consent, with implication that in order to consent to something one must have knowledge, thereby establishing that the statute should be read disjunctively; court permits forfeiture under § 881 of apartment building used to facilitate drug dealing