Opinion
Submitted January 11, 1988
Decided February 9, 1988
Motion to amend remittitur dismissed for untimeliness (22 N.Y.CRR 500.11 [g] [3]).
Judge TITONE taking no part.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Paul v. Pamela
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 9, 1988
70 N.Y.2d 990 (N.Y. 1988)
Summaries of
Paul v. Pamela
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 9, 1988
70 N.Y.2d 990 (N.Y. 1988)
Case details for
Paul v. Pamela
Case Details
Full title:PAUL B.S., Respondent, v. PAMELA J.S., Respondent. LEGAL AID SOCIETY, as…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 9, 1988
Citations
70 N.Y.2d 990 (N.Y. 1988)
526 N.Y.S.2d 422
521 N.E.2d 429
Citing Cases
Williams v. Troiano
However, inasmuch as respondents violated lawful procedure after initially determining that petitioner was…
Regeneron Pharm. v. Novartis Pharma AGThe doctrine applies if the plaintiff can show "some conduct on the part of the defendant after the initial…