explaining that a sweeping sex-offender regime that is “akin to being placed on permanent probation” has an “effect like punishment” and is “clearly generally understood to be part of one's punishment for a sexual crime” and therefore should not be applied retroactively
Summary of this case from McGuire v. MarshallOP 23-0296
06-13-2023
PATTERSON v. SALMONSEN
Decision without opinion or without extended opinion Denied.
explaining that a sweeping sex-offender regime that is “akin to being placed on permanent probation” has an “effect like punishment” and is “clearly generally understood to be part of one's punishment for a sexual crime” and therefore should not be applied retroactively
Summary of this case from McGuire v. MarshallFull title:PATTERSON v. SALMONSEN
Court:Supreme Court of Montana.
Date published: Jun 13, 2023
Packingham, 582 U.S. at 107. Nonetheless, it is important to understand the unusual and, as the Supreme Court…
People v. LymonThese requirements are also based solely on a registrant's conviction and not on any individualized…