stating without comment that § 64a applies to SIPA liquidation and then applying the subsection of 64a that grants priority to an attorney's fee
Summary of this case from Sec. Exchange Com'n v. Sec. Northwest, Inc.No. 73-562.
December 10, 1973, OCTOBER TERM, 1973.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 481 F. 2d 1045.
stating without comment that § 64a applies to SIPA liquidation and then applying the subsection of 64a that grants priority to an attorney's fee
Summary of this case from Sec. Exchange Com'n v. Sec. Northwest, Inc.Full title:PATLOGAN ET AL. v. DICKSTEIN, SHAPIRO GALLIGAN, NOW COLSON SHAPIRO, ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 10, 1973
In deciding whether the consideration received by petitioners for the water rights and right-of-way conveyed…
Gilbertz v. United StatesSee generally 1 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Tax § 6A.21, at 95 (1986); C. Russell R. Bowhay, Income…