From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parrott v. Sawyer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1881
87 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1881)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Davis v. Leopold (87 N.Y. 622) the fraudulent grantee assumed the payment of a pre-existing mortgage, and on review of the judgment setting aside the deed, this court said, "if it was true under the findings that Mrs. Leopold was entitled to protection for the sum paid or the liability assumed, it would, indeed, be necessary to state the amount.

Summary of this case from H.N. Bank et al. v. Halsted
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued October 24, 1881

Decided November 22, 1881

Albert Stickney for appellant.

William G. Wilson for respondent.

Per Curiam opinion for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute on stipulation.

All concur.

Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.

Summaries of

Parrott v. Sawyer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1881
87 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1881)

In Davis v. Leopold (87 N.Y. 622) the fraudulent grantee assumed the payment of a pre-existing mortgage, and on review of the judgment setting aside the deed, this court said, "if it was true under the findings that Mrs. Leopold was entitled to protection for the sum paid or the liability assumed, it would, indeed, be necessary to state the amount.

Summary of this case from H.N. Bank et al. v. Halsted
Case details for

Parrott v. Sawyer

Case Details

Full title:JOHN PARROTT, Appellant, v . JOSEPH SAWYER, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1881

Citations

87 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1881)

Citing Cases

Straus v. Sage

The giving of the note was not the making of a debt, but only a promise to pay the old one, and an extension…

H.N. Bank et al. v. Halsted

In Union National Bank v. Warner (12 Hun, 306) the fraudulent grantee had assumed the payment of certain…

3 Citing Cases