Summary
applying Whitmarsh v. Farnell, supra, 298 N Y at 343, 83 N.E.2d 543, reasoning to rent stabilization as well as rent control context
Summary of this case from Resolution Trust Corp. v. DiamondOpinion
Decided June 23, 1982
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, LESTER EVENS, J.
M. William Scherer for appellant.
George R. Osborne for respondents.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. A notice to cure was required whether the proceeding be as a holdover after termination of tenancy (RPAPL 711, subd 1; Code of Metropolitan Hotel Industry Stabilization Assn. [Hotel Code], §§ 50, 53, subd [a]) or as a nonpayment proceeding (RPAPL 711, subd 2; Hotel Code, § 50).
Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.