From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palitz v. Palitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 1985
111 A.D.2d 119 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Summary

In Palitz, where there was a question as to whether assets of a dissolved corporation constituted marital property, the lower court had required $11 million to be placed in escrow in an interest bearing account.

Summary of this case from Kahn v. Kahn

Opinion

May 23, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (S. Ostrau, J.).


The issue of whether all or part of the assets of the American Rediscount Corporation constitute marital property remains for resolution in this action. Special Term fashioned a suitable interim remedy by allowing defendant and the children of the marriage unrestrained access to more than $11 million in proceeds from the corporation's dissolution while still preserving an identifiable fund in the event it is determined that these assets did constitute marital property. However, as urged by defendant, an interest-bearing account does not represent a realistic way to manage funds of the magnitude herein, and we modify the order of Special Term so that other prudent investments yielding substantially greater returns can be made. Additionally, we note that the portion of the order directing American Rediscount Corporation to place the subject proceeds in escrow is moot since such turnover has apparently been accomplished and the corporation has been liquidated.

We have examined the remaining contentions of both parties and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Asch, Fein and Rosenberger, JJ.


Summaries of

Palitz v. Palitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 1985
111 A.D.2d 119 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

In Palitz, where there was a question as to whether assets of a dissolved corporation constituted marital property, the lower court had required $11 million to be placed in escrow in an interest bearing account.

Summary of this case from Kahn v. Kahn
Case details for

Palitz v. Palitz

Case Details

Full title:MURIEL D. PALITZ, Respondent-Appellant, v. CLARENCE Y. PALITZ, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 23, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 119 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Kahn v. Kahn

The Appellate Division, therefore, modified the lower court's injunction so as to allow the defendant to…

El-Dehdan v. El-Dehdan

g equitable distribution, to maintain the status quo, and to prevent the dissipation of marital property, the…