From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Dretke

U.S.
May 1, 2006
547 U.S. 1118 (2006)

Summary

finding no good cause for delay due to ongoing illness where evidence did not explain change in circumstances between period in which appellant complied with Board deadlines and period in which he failed to comply

Summary of this case from Turman–kent v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Opinion

No. 05-9878.

May 1, 2006.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Dretke

U.S.
May 1, 2006
547 U.S. 1118 (2006)

finding no good cause for delay due to ongoing illness where evidence did not explain change in circumstances between period in which appellant complied with Board deadlines and period in which he failed to comply

Summary of this case from Turman–kent v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

finding no good cause for delay due to ongoing illness where evidence did not explain change in circumstances between period in which appellant complied with Board deadlines and period in which he failed to comply

Summary of this case from Turman-Kent v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.
Case details for

Ortiz v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:ORTIZ v. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE…

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 1, 2006

Citations

547 U.S. 1118 (2006)
126 S. Ct. 1924

Citing Cases

Turman–kent v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Those filings were made during the multiyear period in which she was not under the care of Dr. Cavanaugh, and…

Turman-Kent v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Those filings were made during the multi-year period in which she was not under the care of Dr. Cavanaugh,…