From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Reilly v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1999
261 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 3, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.).


Ordered that the order dated March 9, 1998, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 28, 1998, is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In this personal injury action arising from a motor vehicle accident, testimony that the injured plaintiff sustained, incipient carpal tunnel syndrome was insufficient to satisfy the threshold criteria that she sustained a permanent consequential limitation of a body organ or member (see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 957). The medical testimony as to the other medical conditions identified by the plaintiffs' medical expert was unsupported by objective medical testing (see, Merisca v. Alford, 243 A.D.2d 613; Lincoln v. Johnson, 225 A.D.2d 593; Duvivier v. Bruso, 221 A.D.2d 411; Kimball v. Baker, 174 A.D.2d 925, 927), and did not support the claim that the injured plaintiff was disabled during 90 out of 180 days after the accident (see, Hausman v. Gourville, 248 A.D.2d 674). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion to set aside the jury's verdict finding that the injured plaintiff sustained a "serious injury". In light of our determination, the remaining issues raised by the appeals are academic.

Santucci, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Reilly v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1999
261 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

O'Reilly v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:COLLEEN O'REILLY et al., Appellants, v. BERNARD NELSON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 221

Citing Cases

Rookwood v. Valdez

However, I would note that the plaintiff's injury would most likely not meet either of these standards. See…

Passarelle v. Burger

The plaintiff's subjective complaints of headaches were insufficient to defeat the motion (see, Alvarez v.…