From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duvivier v. Bruso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1995
221 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 13, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and the complaint is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed as academic in light of our determination on the appeal from the judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The plaintiff's evidence showed that he suffered from a lumbosacral sprain and some minor limitations of movement. However, his testimony failed to quantify either the pain he suffered or the limitations of movement. Under the circumstances of this case, the proof adduced by the plaintiff showed, at best, minor limitations on his use of a body function or system. Such is insufficient to permit a jury to find that there was a serious injury pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Gaddy v Elyer, 79 N.Y.2d 955; Adams v Holy Spirit Assn. Unification of World Christianity, 216 A.D.2d 261; Cannizzaro v King, 187 A.D.2d 842). Thompson, J.P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Duvivier v. Bruso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1995
221 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Duvivier v. Bruso

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND DUVIVIER, Respondent, v. KATHERINE T. BRUSO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 544

Citing Cases

O'Reilly v. Nelson

In this personal injury action arising from a motor vehicle accident, testimony that the injured plaintiff…

In re American Home Assurance Company

Moreover, by requesting such relief, the appellant necessarily placed the issue of confirmation of the award…