Summary
adopting its position in Moore v. Moore, 401 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (urging that "trial courts expressly state their reservation of jurisdiction . . . without resort to `nominal' alimony awards" where record shows that spouse may require support "in the near or foreseeable future")
Summary of this case from Gergen v. GergenOpinion
No. 81-468.
December 23, 1981.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Osceola County; Alexander D. Hall, Jr., Acting Circuit Judge.
Franklin T. Walden of Massey, Alper Walden, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for appellant.
J. Chester Kerr, Kissimmee, for appellee.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed. We repeat our admonition as enunciated in Moore v. Moore, 401 So.2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981): "In the future we urge that the trial courts expressly state their reservation of jurisdiction in these cases without resort to `nominal' alimony awards." Id. at 842.
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, Chief Judge, and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ., concur.