From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olympic Manufacturing Co. v. Shepherd

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 11, 1966
190 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Summary

In Olympic, the trial judge dictated a final judgment the same day as the hearing and left office the next day; his successor signed the decree.

Summary of this case from Carr v. Byers

Opinion

No. 66-355.

October 11, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Gene Williams, J.

Jack M. Bernard, Miami, for appellant.

Joseph A. McGowan, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.


Plaintiff, Olympic Manufacturing Company, takes this interlocutory appeal from an order granting rehearing.

This cause which was concluded on January 11, 1966, was heard before Judge Ray Pearson. Judge Pearson dictated the final decree on January 11, 1966. On January 12, 1966 Judge Pearson's term of office expired. On January 17, 1966, his successor, Judge Gene Williams signed the decree which had been dictated by Judge Pearson.

Judge Williams granted rehearing on the ground that the decree is void because he was without jurisdiction to sign and enter it.

"It is generally stated that a successor judge may complete any acts uncompleted by his predecessor where they do not require the successor to weigh and compare testimony." Bradford v. Foundation Marine Construction Co., Fla.App. 1966, 182 So.2d 447, 449; See Groover v. Walker, Fla. 1956, 88 So.2d 312.

We conclude from the above that Judge Williams had the authority to sign and enter the final decree. Therefore, it was error to grant the defendant's petition for rehearing. We have also reviewed defendant's contention on cross-appeal and find it to be without merit.

Accordingly the order appealed is reversed.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Olympic Manufacturing Co. v. Shepherd

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 11, 1966
190 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

In Olympic, the trial judge dictated a final judgment the same day as the hearing and left office the next day; his successor signed the decree.

Summary of this case from Carr v. Byers
Case details for

Olympic Manufacturing Co. v. Shepherd

Case Details

Full title:OLYMPIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, A GEORGIA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 11, 1966

Citations

190 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Silvern v. Silvern

The appellee relies upon one such case from this court. See Olympic Manufacturing Co. v. Shepherd, Fla.App.…

Hartney v. Piedmont Tech. Inc.

In a much earlier case, the Third District held that a successor judge could properly sign a decree that had…