From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 19, 2007
No. 1276 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Sep. 19, 2007)

Summary

King failed to report two arrests on his Pennsylvania and New Jersey Bar Applications and failed to report on his Pennsylvania Bar Application that he provided false information on his law school application, was suspended for one year

Summary of this case from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tuerk

Opinion

No. 1276 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

September 19, 2007.

No. 91 DB 2007, Attorney Registration No. 201346, Philadelphia.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2007, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated July 24, 2007, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

ORDERED that Edward John King is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year, retroactive to August 1, 2007, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 19, 2007
No. 1276 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Sep. 19, 2007)

King failed to report two arrests on his Pennsylvania and New Jersey Bar Applications and failed to report on his Pennsylvania Bar Application that he provided false information on his law school application, was suspended for one year

Summary of this case from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tuerk
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. EDWARD JOHN KING, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 19, 2007

Citations

No. 1276 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Sep. 19, 2007)

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tuerk

for admission to the Bar. The Supreme Court has imposed public discipline in recognition of the importance…