From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.Y. State Dep. of Labor v. Gen. Elec. Co.

U.S.
Jun 4, 1990
496 U.S. 912 (1990)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

prevailing wage statute "relates to" ERISA plan when employer was required to keep, and on request file with the state, sworn schedules of benefits and wages and to make its books and records pertaining to wages, benefits and hours of labor available for inspection by a state fiscal officer

Summary of this case from Assoc. Bldrs. Contractors v. Perry
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

No. 89-1590.

June 4, 1990, October TERM, 1989.

C.A. 2d Cir. Motions of Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO, and Joint Industry Board of Electrical Industry for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 891 F. 2d 25.

Summaries of

N.Y. State Dep. of Labor v. Gen. Elec. Co.

U.S.
Jun 4, 1990
496 U.S. 912 (1990)

prevailing wage statute "relates to" ERISA plan when employer was required to keep, and on request file with the state, sworn schedules of benefits and wages and to make its books and records pertaining to wages, benefits and hours of labor available for inspection by a state fiscal officer

Summary of this case from Assoc. Bldrs. Contractors v. Perry

prevailing wage law requiring ex-locality employers to bring "supplements" consisting of remuneration in the form of various non-cash employee benefits into conformity with those prevailing in the locality or to make up the difference in cash payments held preempted by ERISA

Summary of this case from Associated Builders and Contractors v. Curry
Case details for

N.Y. State Dep. of Labor v. Gen. Elec. Co.

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ET AL. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 4, 1990

Citations

496 U.S. 912 (1990)
110 S. Ct. 2603

Citing Cases

National Elevator Industry, Inc. v. Calhoon

Fourth, laws and common-law rules that provide remedies for misconduct growing out of the administration of…

Associated Dry Goods v. Towers Fin. Corp.

Therefore, we find that Finley does not bar the district court from exercising ancillary jurisdiction over…

31 Citing Cases