From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nowland v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1858
9 Cal. 51 (Cal. 1858)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Dickinson v. Maguire, 9 Cal. 51, it is said: "At common law, a man disseised of his land might lawfully regain possession thereof by force; and the party turned out by force had no remedy to regain possession."

Summary of this case from Ely v. Yore
See 1 Summary

Opinion

         Writ of Error to the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, County of Amador.

         COUNSEL

          Samuel J. R. Handy, for Plaintiffs.

         Smith & Hardy, for Defendants.

         JUDGES: Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Terry, C. J., concurring.

         OPINION

          BURNETT, Judge

         Writ of error dismissed, on the authority of Haight v. Gay , 8 Cal. 297.

Summaries of

Nowland v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1858
9 Cal. 51 (Cal. 1858)

In Dickinson v. Maguire, 9 Cal. 51, it is said: "At common law, a man disseised of his land might lawfully regain possession thereof by force; and the party turned out by force had no remedy to regain possession."

Summary of this case from Ely v. Yore
Case details for

Nowland v. Vaughn

Case Details

Full title:NOWLAND et al. v. VAUGHN et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1858

Citations

9 Cal. 51 (Cal. 1858)

Citing Cases

Rose v. Rose

         The statement in the complaint of the cause of action for intemperance is insufficient. ( Civ. Code,…

Ely v. Yore

So that that is the question. In Dickinson v. Maguire , 9 Cal. 51, it is said: "At common law, a man…

3 Citing Cases