concluding that the narrowing function does not occur under the FDPA until the penalty phase

reversing criminal contempt conviction because written order directing the defendant, a plaintiff's attorney, "not to . . . introduce any evidence regarding the financial status of the [d]efendant," did not clearly and unambiguously specify that attorney could not introduce defendant's payroll information, as opposed to evidence regarding its net worth

dismissing Title VII claim against individual employees

excluding non-statutory factors as duplicative

noting that a jury could convict a defendant of kidnapping in which death results but find, at the penalty phase, that the defendant did not cause the death of the victim during the course of the kidnapping