From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neildan Construction Corp. v. Angona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The third-party defendant was entitled to rely upon the facially valid power of attorney in this case since the circumstances surrounding its presentation would not have put a reasonable person on notice that something was amiss (see, Grasso v. Fiumara, 167 A.D.2d 510; cf., Collision Plan Unlimited v Bankers Trust Co., 63 N.Y.2d 827). Thus, the Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the third-party complaint. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Neildan Construction Corp. v. Angona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Neildan Construction Corp. v. Angona

Case Details

Full title:NEILDAN CONSTRUCTION CORP., Plaintiff, v. ROBERT ANGONA et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 590

Citing Cases

US Bank National Ass'n v Gestetner

We disagree. Several irregularities sufficient to "put a reasonable person on notice that something was…

Sklavos v. OKI-DO Ltd.

Ct Westchester Co. 2005] ; In Re Kislak , 7 Misc 3d 889 [Surr. Ct NY Co.2004] ; In Re McArthur , 173 AD 517…