From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grasso v. Fiumara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Buell, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant bank and title insurance company were entitled to rely upon the statutory short-form power of attorney (see, General Obligations Law § 5-1501) presented to them by the defendant Fiumara, the plaintiffs' son-in-law, as that form was valid on its face and the circumstances surrounding its presentation would not have put a reasonable person on notice that something was amiss (cf., Collision Plan Unlimited v. Bankers Trust Co., 63 N.Y.2d 827). Thus, the Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the negligence causes of action asserted against those defendants. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Kunzeman and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grasso v. Fiumara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Grasso v. Fiumara

Case Details

Full title:MICHELE GRASSO et al., Appellants, v. RAFFAELE FIUMARA, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 181

Citing Cases

Sklavos v. OKI-DO Ltd.

The Defendant, however, argues that controlling authority serves to bar the Plaintiffs' claim and cites to…

Ruchman v. Wolff

Summary judgment in Action No. 1 was properly granted since plaintiff cannot point to any act of defendants…