From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nedab v. Neal

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 20, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-07 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-07 Erie.

February 20, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on January 11, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 26], filed on January 29, 2007, recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss (partial) [Doc. No. 18] be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss (partial) [Doc. No. 18] is GRANTED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 26] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on January 29, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Nedab v. Neal

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 20, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-07 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Nedab v. Neal

Case Details

Full title:ABDUL NEDAB, Plaintiff, v. DAVID NEAL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 20, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-07 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2007)

Citing Cases

Reed v. City of Greenwood

In American jurisprudence, a private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or…