Summary
finding that defendant adequately demonstrated through the sworn affidavit of doctor, a reasonable excuse for his default based on evidence that he suffered severe anxiety and depression during the relevant period
Summary of this case from Hemmings v. SuttonOpinion
April 19, 2007.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered September 18, 2006, which granted defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him and restore the case to the calendar, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Before: Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
The record discloses that plaintiff allowed the case to lie dormant for almost ten years, and that when the case was finally to be tried defendant's health had so deteriorated that he was unable to communicate effectively with counsel. Defendant adequately demonstrated, through the sworn affidavit of his doctor, that his default was due to extreme anxiety and depression during the relevant period. Defendant has also adequately demonstrated the meritorious nature of his defense through his discovery responses. In view of defendant's showing, and the strong policy favoring adjudication on the merits ( Navarro v A. Trenkman Estate, Inc., 279 AD2d 257), the motion court properly exercised its discretion in granting defendant's motion.