From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nationwide Mut. v. Lafarge Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 28, 1997
121 F.3d 699 (4th Cir. 1997)

Summary

affirming denial of request for mandamus to prevent certain prosecutors from participating in proceedings

Summary of this case from Nance v. Werlich

Opinion

Nos. 96-1389, 96-1453, 96-2356, 96-2559.

August 28, 1997.

Appeal from the D.Md., 910 F.Supp. 1104.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Nationwide Mut. v. Lafarge Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 28, 1997
121 F.3d 699 (4th Cir. 1997)

affirming denial of request for mandamus to prevent certain prosecutors from participating in proceedings

Summary of this case from Nance v. Werlich

explaining that a prisoner may not raise a claim under Section 1983 to contest information in his parole file because a prisoner does not have a liberty interest in being granted parole

Summary of this case from Wortman v. Tenn. Bd. of Parole

explaining that a prisoner may not raise a claim under Section 1983 to contest information in his parole file because a prisoner does not have a liberty interest in being granted parole

Summary of this case from Boyd v. Staggs

applying North Carolina law to interpret insurance contract where parties conceded that North Carolina law applied

Summary of this case from Ellis v. Arrowood Indem. Co.
Case details for

Nationwide Mut. v. Lafarge Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lafarge Corp. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 28, 1997

Citations

121 F.3d 699 (4th Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Wortman v. Tenn. Bd. of Parole

However, "reliance on false information in a parole hearing does not constitute a violation of due process…

Witherspoon v. Matthews

Hence, under the analysis set forth in Sandin, Plaintiff has not shown that he has a protected liberty…