Summary
In Muniz v. Warwick School Dist. (293 AD2d 724 [2nd Dept 2002]), a student participating in a softball game was injured when he was hit in the head by a baseball bat released by a fellow student after hitting the ball.
Summary of this case from IN RE CLARK v. SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY CTRL. SCH.Opinion
2001-07545
Submitted March 28, 2002.
April 29, 2002.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Warwick School District appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), dated June 29, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
McCormick Turpin, Pearl River, N.Y. (Stephen J. Hubel of counsel), for appellant.
Larkin, Axelrod, Trachte Tetenbaum, LLP, Newburgh, N.Y. (Gregory M. Sobo of counsel), for respondents.
Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The infant plaintiff Marc Muniz was voluntarily participating in a softball game during a physical education class at Warwick High School. He was the "on-deck" batter when he was struck in the head by a baseball bat that was released by a fellow student, the defendant Mitchell Jacobson, after hitting the ball. The defendant Warwick School District (hereinafter the District) subsequently moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the ground that the infant plaintiff assumed the risk of injury by voluntarily participating in the softball game. The Supreme Court denied the motion. We affirm.
The District correctly contends that being struck in the head by a bat is a risk inherent in the sport of softball (see Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471; Checci v. Socorro, 169 A.D.2d 807; Marlowe v. Rush-Henrietta Cent. School Dist., 167 A.D.2d 820, affd 78 N.Y.2d 1096). However, after the District made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiffs' expert and eyewitness affidavits raised questions of fact as to whether the risk of injury was unreasonably increased by the failure of the District's physical education teacher, who was supervising the game, to issue helmets to the players and to direct them regarding a safe place to stand on a field lacking fences, on-deck circles, or dugouts (see Stryker v. Jericho Union Free School Dist., 244 A.D.2d 330; Baker v. Briarcliff School Dist., 205 A.D.2d 652; Parisi v. Harpursville Cent. School Dist., 160 A.D.2d 1079).
SANTUCCI, J.P., FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.