From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullinax v. Radian Guaranty Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 30, 2004
1:00CV01247 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2004)

Summary

holding that Congress did not intend to "allow a private plaintiff to sue for an alleged violation of RESPA's anti-kickback provision when the plaintiff has not alleged that the referral arrangement increased any of the settlement charges at issue or that any portion of the charge for the settlement service was involved in the kickback violation"

Summary of this case from Alexander v. Washington Mutual, Inc.

Opinion

1:00CV01247

March 30, 2004


ORDER AND JUDGMENT


For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Document #27]

Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint with respect to Plaintiffs' attempt to add Joseph and Verda Adams to this cause of action is DENIED and that Plaintiff's Verda and Joseph Adams were properly added as Plaintiffs to this action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Document #27] is GRANTED with respect to all Plaintiffs for lack of standing and that Plaintiff's Mullinax, Pike, and Joseph and Verda Adams' claims are hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Mullinax v. Radian Guaranty Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 30, 2004
1:00CV01247 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2004)

holding that Congress did not intend to "allow a private plaintiff to sue for an alleged violation of RESPA's anti-kickback provision when the plaintiff has not alleged that the referral arrangement increased any of the settlement charges at issue or that any portion of the charge for the settlement service was involved in the kickback violation"

Summary of this case from Alexander v. Washington Mutual, Inc.

granting a motion to dismiss, in part because "denials of wrongdoing by Defendants . . . fail to show that Defendants fraudulently concealed their alleged misconduct"

Summary of this case from Earthworks Grp. v. A&K Props. of S.C., Inc.

dismissing for lack of standing a RESPA claim without a contestable overcharge

Summary of this case from Alston v. Countrywide Financial Corporation

dismissing borrowers' RESPA claims for lack of standing and failure to plead details of purported kickback scheme with sufficient particularity

Summary of this case from Williams v. First American Title Insurance Company
Case details for

Mullinax v. Radian Guaranty Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD C. MULLINAX, JR., PERRY PIKE, JOSEPH ADAMS, and VERDA ADAMS, on…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Mar 30, 2004

Citations

1:00CV01247 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2004)

Citing Cases

Alston v. Countrywide Financial Corporation

There is considerable disagreement among federal district courts that have addressed this very issue. Compare…

Winn v. Alamo Title Insurance Company

Numerous federal district courts have applied the filed rate doctrine to actions against insurers subject to…