From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mueller v. Harry Lee Motors

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 2, 1976
334 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Summary

In Mueller v. Harry Lee Motors, 334 So.2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), this Court held that an employee had good cause to terminate his employment for not receiving overtime compensation for overtime worked.

Summary of this case from Madison v. Williams Island Ctry. Club

Opinion

No. 76-17.

June 2, 1976.

Petition for review from the Industrial Relations Commission.

John Lazarus and Gail Taft, legal intern, Legal Services of Greater Miami, Miami, for petitioner.

James R. Parks, Miami, for respondents.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.


Petitioner, Barry W. Mueller, by certiorari seeks review of the denial of his claim for unemployment benefits.

On September 15, 1973 petitioner was hired by Harry Lee Motors to work a 44-hour week with overtime to be paid in excess of 44 hours. Upon telephoning the Bureau of Wages, he was informed that an employee is entitled to be paid overtime for the additional hours he works in excess of 40 hours per week. Petitioner attempted to discuss this issue with his boss, who refused and told petitioner if he was dissatisfied he could quit. Petitioner walked off the job and when he returned the next day, was informed that he had been replaced. After a hearing, petitioner's claim for unemployment compensation was denied by the claims examiner. The denial was affirmed by the appeals referee and the Industrial Relations Commission.

The law is established that an employee who voluntarily leaves his employment for good cause is still entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. Williams v. Florida Industrial Commission, Fla. App. 1961, 135 So.2d 435. Good cause must be one which would reasonably impel the average able-bodied qualified worker to give up his or her employment. Uniweld Products, Inc. v. Industrial Relations Commission, Fla.App. 1973, 277 So.2d 827.

We conclude petitioner had the requisite good cause to terminate his employment in that he was not receiving overtime compensation for the additional four hours worked.

Certiorari is granted, order of denial is quashed and the cause is remanded for the entry of an order allowing petitioner benefits.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Mueller v. Harry Lee Motors

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 2, 1976
334 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

In Mueller v. Harry Lee Motors, 334 So.2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), this Court held that an employee had good cause to terminate his employment for not receiving overtime compensation for overtime worked.

Summary of this case from Madison v. Williams Island Ctry. Club
Case details for

Mueller v. Harry Lee Motors

Case Details

Full title:BARRY W. MUELLER, PETITIONER, v. HARRY LEE MOTORS, EMPLOYER, AND FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 2, 1976

Citations

334 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Dept. of Emp. Training Serv

Although Thomas voluntarily left his employment, if the Fair Labor Standards Act (Act) is applicable to his…

Martinez v. Ford Midway Mall, Inc.

We note that, twice before, this Court has addressed whether an employee was eligible for unemployment…