From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morreale v. 105 Page Homeowners Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 2009
64 A.D.3d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Summary

In Morreale v. 105 Page Homeowners Assn., Inc., 64 A.D.3d 689, 884 N.Y.S.2d 93, the relevant testimony revealed that on or about December 31, 2005, the plaintiff moved to her son's apartment in Brooklyn from her house in Staten Island after a "diabetic episode," in March or April 2006, she entered into a contract to purchase a house in New Jersey, and on August 8, 2006, three days after commencing the subject action, she "took over" her new house in New Jersey, which she moved into in November 2006 (id. at 690, 884 N.Y.S.2d 93 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Summary of this case from Fisch v. Davidson

Opinion

No. 2008-07376.

July 21, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Joseph Fallacaro and Nancy Fallacaro appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated June 30, 2008, as, in effect, upon renewal, adhered to the determination in a prior order dated January 8, 2007, denying their motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (1) and 511 to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County.

Everett J. Petersson, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Michael A. Serpico of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

White, Quinlan Staley, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Arthur T. McQuillan of counsel), for defendant-respondent Perillo Chiropractic, LLP.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Miller, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order dated June 30, 2008 is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with one bill of costs payable by the plaintiff to the defendants Joseph Fallacaro and Nancy Fallacaro, upon renewal, the order dated January 8, 2007 is vacated, the motion of the defendants Joseph Fallacaro and Nancy Fallacaro to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County is granted, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, all papers filed in this action and certified copies of all minutes and entries ( see CPLR 511 [d]).

Upon renewal, the appellants submitted excerpts of the Plaintiff's deposition testimony, which was taken after the Supreme Court's original order dated January 8, 2007, denying their motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (1) and 511 to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County. The relevant testimony revealed that on or about December 31, 2005, which was just over one year after the subject accident, the plaintiff moved to her son's apartment in Brooklyn from her house in Staten Island after a "diabetic episode," that in March or April 2006, she entered into a contract to purchase a house in New Jersey, that on August 8, 2006, three days after commencing this action, she "took over" her new house in New Jersey, and moved into it in November 2006.

A residence for venue purposes is a place where one stays for some time with "the bona fide intent to retain the place as a residence for some length of time and with some degree of permanency" ( Katz v Siroty, 62 AD2d 1011, 1012; see Jones-Ledbetter v Biltmore Auto Sales, 229 AD2d 518, 519; Mandelbaum v Mandelbaum, 151 AD2d 727, 728).

Upon renewal, the appellants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff was temporarily staying at the Brooklyn apartment at the time she commenced this action without "the bona fide intent to retain the place as a residence for some length of time and with some degree of permanency" ( Katz v Siroty, 62 AD2d at 1012; see Neu v St. John's Episcopal Hosp., 27 AD3d 538; Jones-Ledbetter v Biltmore Auto Sales, 229 AD2d at 519; Sibrizzi v Mount Tom Day School, 155 AD2d 337). The plaintiff failed to rebut that showing ( see Samuel v Green, 276 AD2d 687). Accordingly, upon renewal, the appellants' motion to change venue from Kings County to Richmond County, the county where the defendants resided, should have been granted ( see CPLR 503 [a]; Maggio v Wal-Mart Stores, 275 AD2d 350, 351).


Summaries of

Morreale v. 105 Page Homeowners Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 2009
64 A.D.3d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

In Morreale v. 105 Page Homeowners Assn., Inc., 64 A.D.3d 689, 884 N.Y.S.2d 93, the relevant testimony revealed that on or about December 31, 2005, the plaintiff moved to her son's apartment in Brooklyn from her house in Staten Island after a "diabetic episode," in March or April 2006, she entered into a contract to purchase a house in New Jersey, and on August 8, 2006, three days after commencing the subject action, she "took over" her new house in New Jersey, which she moved into in November 2006 (id. at 690, 884 N.Y.S.2d 93 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Summary of this case from Fisch v. Davidson

In Morreale v 105 Page Homeowners Assn., Inc. (64 A.D.3d 689), the relevant testimony revealed that on or about December 31, 2005, the plaintiff moved to her son's apartment in Brooklyn from her house in Staten Island after a "diabetic episode," in March or April 2006, she entered into a contract to purchase a house in New Jersey, and on August 8, 2006, three days after commencing the subject action, she "took over" her new house in New Jersey, which she moved into in November 2006 (id. at 690 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Summary of this case from Fisch v. Davidson

In Morreale v 105 Page Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. (64 AD3d 689, 690 [2d Dept 2009]), the evidence "revealed that on or about December 31, 2005, which was just over one year after the subject accident, the plaintiff moved to her son's apartment in Brooklyn from her house in Staten Island after a 'diabetic episode,' that in March or April 2006, she entered into a contract to purchase a house in New Jersey, that on August 8, 2006, three days after commencing this action, she 'took over' her new house in New Jersey, and moved into it in November 2006."

Summary of this case from Coughlin v. Sarraf
Case details for

Morreale v. 105 Page Homeowners Assoc

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA MORREALE, Respondent, v. 105 PAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 21, 2009

Citations

64 A.D.3d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5952
884 N.Y.S.2d 93

Citing Cases

Fisch v. Davidson

Further, contrary to the Supreme Court's conclusion, the time the defendant spent in the Southampton house in…

Gruenwald v. Polatseck

ted evidence, including the plaintiffs' driving records, various hospital records, a United States Postal…