From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morla v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Jul 22, 2008
956 A.2d 31 (Del. 2008)

Summary

holding that there was no evidence that the trial court abused its discretion in determining that an evidentiary hearing in connection with the defendant's postconviction motion was not necessary

Summary of this case from State v. Jackson

Opinion

No. 522, 2007.

July 22, 2008.

Appeal from the Superior Cr 0508014827.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS. AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Morla v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Jul 22, 2008
956 A.2d 31 (Del. 2008)

holding that there was no evidence that the trial court abused its discretion in determining that an evidentiary hearing in connection with the defendant's postconviction motion was not necessary

Summary of this case from State v. Jackson

affirming the trial court's determination that a hearing pursuant to Rule 61(h) was not necessary

Summary of this case from State v. Tucker
Case details for

Morla v. State

Case Details

Full title:Morla v. State

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Jul 22, 2008

Citations

956 A.2d 31 (Del. 2008)

Citing Cases

State v. Tucker

Del. Super. Crim. R. 61(h)(1).See Morla v. State, 2008 WL 2809156, at *1 (Del. July 22, 2008) (affirming the…

State v. Jackson

Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(h)(1).Morla v. State, 2008 WL 2809156 (Del.Supr.) (holding that there was no evidence…