From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 2, 1992
597 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Summary

holding that allegation of insufficiency of evidence could have been raised on direct appeal and was improperly raised in motion for postconviction relief

Summary of this case from Clift v. State

Opinion

No. 91-3088.

April 2, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, John Southwood, J.

Appellant pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Darryl Montana has appealed an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In February 1989, Montana was convicted of second-degree murder. His conviction was affirmed without opinion. Montana v. State, 559 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Montana filed the instant motion in August 1991, alleging insufficiency of the evidence, erroneous admission of hearsay, ineffective assistance of counsel, and that his sentence was illegal because the trial court exceeded the recommended guidelines range without providing written reasons. The trial court summarily denied the motion, finding that "most" of the issues raised by Montana could and should have been raised on direct appeal, and that no legal basis for ineffective assistance of counsel had been stated. The illegality of Montana's sentence was not specifically addressed.

We agree with the trial court that the allegations of insufficiency of the evidence and the erroneous admission of hearsay could have been raised on Montana's direct appeal, and hence are improperly raised in a Rule 3.850 motion. We also find, as did the trial court, that Montana has not stated a legally sufficient basis for his allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel. However, although his allegation of an illegal sentence, if true, would entitle him to relief, the trial court did not address this allegation in its order. We therefore affirm the order appealed as to all grounds except that alleging an illegal sentence. As to that issue, we reverse and remand either for attachment of those portions of the files and records conclusively showing that Montana is not entitled to relief, or for further proceedings under Rule 3.850.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

JOANOS, C.J., and SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Montana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 2, 1992
597 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

holding that allegation of insufficiency of evidence could have been raised on direct appeal and was improperly raised in motion for postconviction relief

Summary of this case from Clift v. State

holding that allegations of erroneous admission of hearsay could have been raised on defendant's direct appeal and were improperly raised in rule 3.850 motion

Summary of this case from Polewarzyk v. State

finding claims procedurally barred where they could have been raised on direct appeal

Summary of this case from Lewis v. Secretary, Dept. of Corrections
Case details for

Montana v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL MONTANA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 2, 1992

Citations

597 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Timmons v. Sec'y

The order went on to find that any claim of insufficient evidence was also improperly raised in the Rule…

Thomas v. Crosby

4. The Court finds that defendant's first two grounds could have or should have been raised on direct appeal,…