holding that patients who were denied medical treatment on non-emergency basis had standing to bring antitrust action against medical center
Summary of this case from Serfecz v. Jewel Food StoresNo. 91-61.
October 10, 1991.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46. Reported below: 925 F. 2d 1555.
holding that patients who were denied medical treatment on non-emergency basis had standing to bring antitrust action against medical center
Summary of this case from Serfecz v. Jewel Food Storesholding that it was within the district court's discretion to appoint an expert to provide the court scientific information regarding the levels of environmental tobacco smoke in a prison and the potential health effects upon prisoners.
Summary of this case from Yellen v. Olivarezfinding that the phrase "such proportion as the court directs," in an appropriate case, permits the district court to apportion all costs to one side
Summary of this case from Ledford v. Sullivanfinding that the phrase "such proportion as the court directs," in an appropriate case, permits the district court to apportion all costs to one side
Summary of this case from Hampton v. Peeplesfinding that the phrase "such proportion as the court directs," in an appropriate case, permits the district court to apportion all costs to one side
Summary of this case from Mitchell v. Williamsreviewing for an abuse of discretion and noting that "[p]roduction of the transcript at government expense for an appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial question"
Summary of this case from Foster v. Colereviewing for an abuse of discretion and noting that "[p]roduction of the transcript at government expense for an appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial question"
Summary of this case from Gieck v. Donovanreviewing for an abuse of discretion and noting that "[p]roduction of the transcript at government expense for an appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial question"
Summary of this case from Singleton v. Hernandezreviewing for an abuse of discretion and noting that "[p]roduction of the transcript at government expense for an appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial question"
Summary of this case from Brown v. Kylereasoning that allowing court-appointed experts only when both sides are able to pay their respective shares would hinder a district court from appointing an expert witness, "even when the expert would significantly help the court"
Summary of this case from McCabe v. Gibbonsreasoning that allowing court-appointed experts only when both sides are able to pay their respective shares would hinder a district court from appointing an expert witness, "even when the expert would significantly help the court"
Summary of this case from Smith v. Waddingtonreasoning that allowing court-appointed experts only when both sides are able to pay their respective shares would hinder a district court from appointing an expert witness, "even when the expert would significantly help the court"
Summary of this case from Honeycutt v. Sniderobserving that an expert witness may be appointed if needed to significantly assist the court, and if the case involves complex scientific issues
Summary of this case from Young v. Smallsreasoning that allowing court-appointed experts only when both sides are able to pay their respective shares would hinder a district court from appointing an expert witness, "even when the expert would significantly help the court"
Summary of this case from McGuire v. Statestating expert may be appointed when case is complex
Summary of this case from Johnson v. SullivanFull title:MONROE CLINIC v. NELSON et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 10, 1991
The Court has identified several factors to be considered in determining whether a plaintiff is the proper…
Claiborne v. BlauserAlthough the district court correctly recognized that Rule 706(a) provides discretion to appoint a neutral…