stating that the finality requirement "does not require a judgment `which ends the litigation . . . and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment,' Catlin v. U.S., 324 U.S. 229, 233, 65 S.Ct. 631, 89 L.Ed. 911 . . ., but includes many dispositions which, though not final in that sense, have nevertheless been fully litigated"

stating in dictum liability attaches to misleading statements made knowingly but not recklessly

involving allegations of U.S. antitrust issues, the court said that "to determine Indonesia to be the proper forum . . . would, in effect, deprive plaintiffs of all remedy," assuming that Indonesia would not enforce the foreign antitrust laws

remanding for reconsideration in light of Associated General