From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Gilbert

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 23, 2010
CIVIL NO. C09-5080-BHS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 23, 2010)

Summary

denying motion for default "because all defendants filed an answer within 60 days of accepting service by mail," and "[t]herefore, no defendant was in default."

Summary of this case from Langley v. Tulare Police Dep't

Opinion

CIVIL NO. C09-5080-BHS.

March 23, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 60). The Court having considered the Report and Recommendation and the remaining record, and no objections having been filed, does hereby find and order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; and
(2) The motion for default is DENIED because all defendants filed an answer within 60 days of accepting service by mail. Therefore, no defendant was in default.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Gilbert

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 23, 2010
CIVIL NO. C09-5080-BHS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 23, 2010)

denying motion for default "because all defendants filed an answer within 60 days of accepting service by mail," and "[t]herefore, no defendant was in default."

Summary of this case from Langley v. Tulare Police Dep't
Case details for

Mitchell v. Gilbert

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILBERT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Mar 23, 2010

Citations

CIVIL NO. C09-5080-BHS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Langley v. Tulare Police Dep't

Therefore, Plaintiff's request for entry of default shall be DENIED. See Langston v. Swarthout, No.…

King v. Fiero

Therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's request for entry of default. See Langley v. Tulare Police Dep't, No.…