From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 19, 1996
225 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Summary

In Miller v. City of New York (225 A.D.2d 396, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 807), we found that notice was not required where the trial evidence established that the City affirmatively created the hazard by failing to adequately secure the guardrail.

Summary of this case from Torres v. City of New York

Opinion

March 19, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (William Garry, J.).


The IAS Court properly denied the City's motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the City had not been given prior written notice of the alleged highway defect pursuant to Administrative Code of City of New York § 7-201 (c) (2). Such notice is not required where it is shown that the municipality was affirmatively negligent in causing or creating the defective condition ( see, Messina v City of New York, 190 A.D.2d 659). Here, sufficient evidence was adduced at trial to support a finding that the City negligently left in place an inadequately secured guard rail section adjacent to the sign post into which plaintiff's decedent's car crashed ( cf., supra). Plaintiff's engineering and highway expert concluded that, based on photo exhibits, the guard rail section had not been equipped with the number of bolts required to secure an extended line of railing. Moreover, "work order" documents indicated that repair work had been done by the City on the Gowanus Expressway guard rail near 38th and 39th Streets, where the accident later occurred.

We have considered the parties' remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Miller v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 19, 1996
225 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

In Miller v. City of New York (225 A.D.2d 396, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 807), we found that notice was not required where the trial evidence established that the City affirmatively created the hazard by failing to adequately secure the guardrail.

Summary of this case from Torres v. City of New York
Case details for

Miller v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARC A. MILLER, Individually and as Executor of DENISE G. MILLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 19, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 11

Citing Cases

Wegman v. City of New York

Additionally, he maintains that, pursuant to CPLR 3212(f), the City'smotion should be denied, since there is…

Wegman v. City of New York

A claim alleging a failure to properly install a Detour sign, as alleged by plaintiff, does not fall within…