From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mears v. Marshall

Oregon Supreme Court
Aug 29, 1996
324 Or. 130 (Or. 1996)

Opinion

CC 9307-04839; CA A85078; SC S43073

On petition for review filed February 23, 1996

Petition for review allowed; Decision of the Court of Appeals vacated Case remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration August 29, 1996

On review from the Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, George M. Joseph, Senior Judge. 137 Or. App. 390, 905 P.2d 1154, on recons 138 Or. App. 476, 908 P.2d 212 (1996).

Maureen Leonard and Kathryn J. Clarke, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Eric J. Neiman, of Tooze Shenker Duden Creamer Frank Hutchison, Portland, and Joe W. Redden, Jr., of Beck, Redden Secrest, Houston, filed a response for respondent on review Collagen Corporation.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.

Unis, J., retired June 30, 1996, and did not participate in this decision.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 US ___, 116 S Ct 2240, 135 L Ed 2d 700 (1996).


Summaries of

Mears v. Marshall

Oregon Supreme Court
Aug 29, 1996
324 Or. 130 (Or. 1996)
Case details for

Mears v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:Janice M. MEARS, Petitioner on Review, v. William R. MARSHALL, M.D. and…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Aug 29, 1996

Citations

324 Or. 130 (Or. 1996)
921 P.2d 966

Citing Cases

Mears v. Marshall

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges. On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Mears…

Worthy v. Collagen Corp.

Prior to Medtronic, most courts held that the FDA's approval of Zyderm preempted claims that it was unsafe.…